STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment: > There's no other single function providing the same functionality
time.clock() is not portable: it is a different clock depending on the OS. To write portable code, you have to use the right function: - time.time() - time.steady() - os.times(), resource.getrusage() On Windows, time.clock() should be replaced by time.steady(). On UNIX, time.clock() can be replaced with "usage=os.times(); usage[0]+usage[1]" for example. Which kind of use case is not covered by these functions? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14309> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
