R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: Your presumption is probably correct, however if that is the premise of the patch it is incorrect in detail, since we've already fixed test_queue specifically to be runnable with -m unittest without adding a load_tests. I haven't looked at the other modules Matt is looking at, but it may well be that they can also be fixed without a load_tests.
The test_queue fix is issue 14333, also opened by Matt, but fixed by Michele. I think we should make the tests runnable by unittest, but that we should use load_tests only if making discovery work for a particular test is too invasive. ---------- nosy: +r.david.murray _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14408> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
