Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Yes, it is supposed to, but no one is actually looking at that value. > It was used in debugging information during PyFloat_Fini() which is no > longer relevant if this block information is removed.
Still, let's honour the API rather than break it. > Here's a thought: I think using the linked list approach using > Py_TYPE() is rather neat. Other freelists are mostly implemented > using static arrays of pointers. Any thoughts on this? We could > unify the approach taken. I don't have any preference either way, but I see little point in unifying the approach, since no common code is shared. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14435> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
