Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> added the comment: I checked one example on a 32-bit system (you have a 64-bit?)), because I was afraid pessimization because of a lack of registers. str.find() is faster than str.rfind(), but the patch makes it even faster.
But I would like to see the script and the results of benchmarking of the 1/2/3/20-character ascii/ucs1/ucs2/ucs4-substring in ascii/ucs1/ucs2/ucs4-string, in all possible combinations. May be, such benchmark scripts already exist? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13126> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com