Martin Morrison <martin.morri...@gmail.com> added the comment: This solution has some very undesirable properties - namely that Mar 1st is now less than Feb 29th!
It seems like the correct follow up fix would be to adjust the date of the returned struct_time back to 1900. The struct_time object doesn't have the validation issue, so this works fine. This pair of fixes then nicely circumvents the intermediate datetime object's checking, while providing a consistent end result. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14157> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
