Ray Donnelly <[email protected]> added the comment:
Hi Éric,
Do you mean this bit?:
diff -urN a/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py b/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py
--- a/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py 2012-05-30 07:33:00.234438631 +0100
+++ b/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py 2012-05-30 07:33:03.320855811 +0100
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@
return (CONFIG_H_UNCERTAIN,
"couldn't read '%s': %s" % (fn, exc.strerror))
-RE_VERSION = re.compile(b'(\d+\.\d+(\.\d+)*)')
+RE_VERSION = re.compile(b'[\D\s]*(\d+\.\d+(\.\d+)*)[\D\s]*$')
It's hardly touching distutils and only the cygwinccompiler.py part (which I
doubt is used very much anyway). It there not some extensive testsuite we can
run patches against that would allow distutils changes?
I guess the very limited amount of changes I've made to distutils is academic
though as it depends on two patches from Roumen Petrov which touch distutils a
lot more.
I thought that the distutils-is-frozen rule was only for Python 2.x and that
they would be allowed for 3.x? Is this not true?
Obviously making Python cross compile properly is a very desired feature (in
this day and age I'd say cross-compilation for any major software is expected
to be honest with you). How can we progress this task in a way that is
acceptable? Please advise.
Best regards,
Ray.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3871>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
