Vinay Sajip <[email protected]> added the comment:
It seems like the patch doesn't consider mixing of positional and keyword
arguments: if you have the format string "{foo} {} {bar}", then manual will be
set to True when "foo" is seen as the field_name, and fail soon after when ""
is seen as the field_name the next time around.
So, the test should include something which shows that
fmt.format("{foo} {} {bar}", 2, foo='fooval', bar='barval') returns "fooval 2
barval", whereas with a format string like "{foo} {0} {} {bar}" or "{foo} {}
{0} {bar}" you get a ValueError.
Also, why "automatic field numbering" vs. "manual field specification"? Why not
"numbering" for both?
----------
nosy: +vinay.sajip
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13598>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
