Hynek Schlawack <h...@ox.cx> added the comment: Dear friends of ip addresses, I made something:
refactor dup code, minor janitoring, bump coverage - remove duplicate netmask/hostmask code (it was identical in ipv4address & interface) - make two ifs more pythonic - Refactor and fix packed property for ipv6 addresses and networks. Apparently nobody has ever used this. :) - Test coverage is now at 97%, the rest are mostly unreachable safeguards. Please have a look at it if you will. The test suite passes of course. That said, I'm pretty sure the constructor for IPv6Network is broken (particularly constructing from int and packed – also the the strict tests in these two cases don't make any sense as net mask is always ALL_ONES). I'll be dreaming of ip addresses tonight. ;) ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25824/ipaddress-refactor-and-bump-coverage.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14814> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
