Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: On 14.06.2012 14:26, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > >> It's either secure or it's not. > > I don't think that's true. By that reasoning, Python is not secure so > there's no point in fixing crashes or providing a hashlib module.
The proper statement is "It's either time-independent or it's not". This *is* a binary state (I agree that being secure is not a binary state). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15061> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
