Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: I believe the patch is incorrect. It changes self._acquire_restore into a no-op, claiming that lock_acquire_condition will correctly restore the lock's state.
However, lock_acquire_condition may fail (e.g. if the timeout is not strictly positive), in which case the lock's case isn't properly restored. ---------- nosy: +loewis _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15139> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
