Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > The sysconfig module was modified (and sysconfig.cfg was introduced) > to serve the needs of the resource system (install_data putting files > into system-configured locations and packaging.database finding them); > one of the thousand things mentioned in the “Status of Packaging” > thread was an opinion by PJE that this was a bad choice, and even if I > disagree (being a Debian guy and all :), a PEP would be in order to > decide on such a big new functionality. Should these changes be > reverted too? (I’d think yes.)
What is sysconfig.cfg? Keeping sysconfig is ok IMO. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15147> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
