João Bernardo <jbv...@gmail.com> added the comment:

Of course `nan` and `inf` are part of the syntax! The `ast.parse` function 
recognize them as `Name`. 

So that works:

>>> ast.dump(ast.parse('True'))
"Module(body=[Expr(value=Name(id='True', ctx=Load()))])"

>>> ast.dump(ast.parse('inf'))
"Module(body=[Expr(value=Name(id='inf', ctx=Load()))])"

>>> inf = float('inf')
>>> eval('inf')
inf

I've run into some literals with `Ellipsis` and `inf` and couldn't load them 
with literal_eval. That's why I'm proposing that.

The thing about `nan` and `inf` is because they are the *only* representations 
of float numbers produced by the interpreter that cannot be loaded.

Something like that could solve the problem keeping `literal_eval` safe and 
allowing other names:

ast.literal_eval('[1.0, 2.0, inf]', {'inf': float('inf')})

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15245>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to