Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com> added the comment:

Thanks a lot for the feedback.  The thinking was to use a stand-alone (even 
testable) construct with dependencies made explicit.  For example, it wasn't 
obvious that the current iterator depended on forever, or whether the 
args_tuple parameter was a necessary part of it.  But I agree it should be 
simplified.

Here is a simpler patch, keeping iterator semantics.  My preference is to avoid 
adding lock semantics and additional complexity directly to main(), even though 
doing so would permit a smaller patch.

----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26389/issue-15320-4.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15320>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to