Meador Inge <mead...@gmail.com> added the comment: I am closing this issue in favor of issue6493. This patch attached to this issue is incorrect. The proposed definition of BIT_MASK allows for undefined behavior when the number of bits shifted is 64 for a uint64. The patch in issue6493 handles this case correctly.
---------- nosy: +meador.inge resolution: -> duplicate stage: patch review -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed superseder: -> Can not set value for structure members larger than 32 bits _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6068> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
