Steven Bethard <[email protected]> added the comment:
The tests look like they're testing the right things, but the tests should
instead be written like the rest of the argparse tests. For example, look at
TestOptionalsNargs3 and TestPositionalsNargs2. You could write your tests to
look something like those, e.g.
class TestOptionalsNargs1_3(ParserTestCase):
argument_signatures = [Sig('-x', nargs=(1, 3))]
failures = ['a', '-x', '-x a b c d']
successes = [
('', NS(x=None)),
('-x a', NS(x=['a'])),
('-x a b', NS(x=['a', 'b'])),
('-x a b c', NS(x=['a', 'b', 'c'])),
]
Also, a complete patch will need to document the new feature in the Python
documentation, among other things. See the details described here:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html#preparation
----------
versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.3
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11354>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com