Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
+ // in case init is called multiple times within one interpreter,
+ // we do not have to repeat all of the initialization
First, you shouldn't use C++-style comments ("//").
Second, I find this comment a bit weird. Even if init is called a second time,
surely clear would have been called in-between, and therefore the module state
has to be initialized again?
Review comments from issue15653 also apply here.
----------
nosy: +loewis, pitrou
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15655>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com