Nick Coghlan added the comment: I wouldn't change the export formats used for the 'u' typecode at all in 3.4 - I'd add new typecodes to array that match any new struct format characters and are exported accordingly. 'u' would *never* become a formally defined struct character, instead lingering in the array module as a legacy of the narrow/wide build distinction.
And good point that U would need to match UCS-4 to be consistent with NumPy. Perhaps we can just add 'U' in 3.4 and forget about UCS-2 entirely? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15625> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
