Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Zitat von Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org>:
>> I recommend to close the issue as rejected. > > I think _PyLong_IS_SMALL_INT can be rewritten in a safe style. For > example, using a checking of several fields > ((sdigit)(x)->ob_digit[0] < _MAX_SMALL_INT && PySIZE(x) <= 1) or a > special flag. It is possible however that shuch checking will fully > destroy the effect of optimization. We need further research. Do we need to keep this issue open while this research is being carried out? This issue is already cluttered with the undefined-behavior discussion. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10044> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
