Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I don't like the API. Why should I write "rwlock.acquire_read()" instead of "rwlock.reader.acquire()"? There should be one obvious way to do it.
The fact that "reader_lock" and "writer_lock" return a new object every time is a bit suboptimal, IMO. Also, RWLockBase should be private (_RWLockBase). Ah, and the patch needs docs :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8800> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
