Nadeem Vawda added the comment:
> These were not idle questions. I wrote the patch, and I had to know
> what behavior is correct.
Ah, sorry. I assumed you were going to submit a separate patch to fix the
> Here's the patch. It fixes potential memory bug (unconsumed_tail sets
> to NULL in case of out of memory), resets the unconsumed_tail to b''
> after EOF, updates unconsumed_tail and unused_data in flush().
Did you perhaps forget to attach the patch? The only ones I see are those
that you uploaded last week.
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Python-bugs-list mailing list