Giovanni Bajo added the comment: Il giorno 07/nov/2012, alle ore 08:40, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> ha scritto:
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: > > I tested different kind of strings. > > $ ./python -m timeit -n 1 -s "t = b'a' * 10**8" "hash(t)" > $ ./python -m timeit -n 1 -s "t = 'a' * 10**8" "hash(t)" > $ ./python -m timeit -n 1 -s "t = '\u0100' * 10**8" "hash(t)" > $ ./python -m timeit -n 1 -s "t = '\U00010000' * 10**8" "hash(t)" > > current SipHash > > bytes 181 msec 453 msec 2.5x > UCS1 429 msec 453 msec 1.06x > UCS2 179 msec 897 msec 5x > UCS4 183 msec 1.79 sec 9.8x Hi Serhiy, can you please attach the generated assembly code for the siphash function with your compiler and your optimization flags (that is, the one that produces the above results)? Thanks! -- Giovanni Bajo ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14621> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
