STINNER Victor added the comment:
> The matter is not only in the fact that tests passed.
Right, but I don't want to introduce a regression :-)
> They should fail if the original bug occurs again. Have you tried to restore
> the bugs?
test_cmd_line_script.test_non_ascii() comes from the issue #16218, changeset
23ebe277e982. I checked this issue: support_undecodable.patch checks for
non-regression with UTF-8 (and ASCI and ISO-8859-1) locale encoding on UNIX.
test_genericpath.test_non_ascii() comes from the issue #3426, this fix comes
from the issue #3187, changeset 8a7c930abab6. I don't want to spend time on
trying the new test on this issue because this 8a7c930abab6 is a major change,
I don't see how to revert it just to test the issue. I consider the issue has
fixed, and the new test should not reduce the test coverage, but just increase
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Python-bugs-list mailing list