STINNER Victor added the comment:

> The matter is not only in the fact that tests passed.

Right, but I don't want to introduce a regression :-)

> They should fail if the original bug occurs again.  Have you tried to restore 
> the bugs?

test_cmd_line_script.test_non_ascii() comes from the issue #16218, changeset 
23ebe277e982. I checked this issue: support_undecodable.patch checks for 
non-regression with UTF-8 (and ASCI and ISO-8859-1) locale encoding on UNIX.

test_genericpath.test_non_ascii() comes from the issue #3426, this fix comes 
from the issue #3187, changeset 8a7c930abab6. I don't want to spend time on 
trying the new test on this issue because this 8a7c930abab6 is a major change, 
I don't see how to revert it just to test the issue. I consider the issue has 
fixed, and the new test should not reduce the test coverage, but just increase 
it ;-)


Python tracker <>
Python-bugs-list mailing list

Reply via email to