STINNER Victor added the comment: > The matter is not only in the fact that tests passed.
Right, but I don't want to introduce a regression :-) > They should fail if the original bug occurs again. Have you tried to restore > the bugs? test_cmd_line_script.test_non_ascii() comes from the issue #16218, changeset 23ebe277e982. I checked this issue: support_undecodable.patch checks for non-regression with UTF-8 (and ASCI and ISO-8859-1) locale encoding on UNIX. test_genericpath.test_non_ascii() comes from the issue #3426, this fix comes from the issue #3187, changeset 8a7c930abab6. I don't want to spend time on trying the new test on this issue because this 8a7c930abab6 is a major change, I don't see how to revert it just to test the issue. I consider the issue has fixed, and the new test should not reduce the test coverage, but just increase it ;-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16444> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
