Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > This change is specifically aimed at code objects. > As it is, it is impossible to produce code objects that share common > data (e.g. filename strings, common tuples, name strings, etc) that > don't unserialize to separate objects.
Shouldn't strings be interned when the code object is unmarshalled? > This change is based on work done at CCP to reduce the size of > compiled code in memory. Simple preprocessing of code objects prior > to writing them to disk can result in important memory savings. How important? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16475> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com