Ezio Melotti added the comment:

The workaround is now documented.
I'm still not sure if this should still be added, or if it should be closed as 
rejected now that the workaround is documented.
A third option would be adding it as a recipe in the doc, given that the whole 
functions boils down to a single re.sub (the user can take care of picking the 
bytes/str regex depending on his input).


Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Python-bugs-list mailing list

Reply via email to