Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
> > - are you sure ignoring POSTed data is the right thing to do? Shouldn't we
> > forbid it instead?
> > - I think it would be nice to reference the RFC number somewhere
> > - not sure why you raise IOError on a bad URL; I would say ValueError is
> > the right exception here
> I did that because that's what the old URLopener code does (ignoring POSTed
> data and raising an
> IOError). The comment is actually a 1:1 copy of the old code.
Ok. I think it's better to take a fresh start here :-)
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Python-bugs-list mailing list