New submission from Chris Jerdonek:

This issue is to add "buffer protocol" (or perhaps "buffer object") to the 
glossary.  The concept is currently described here:

√Čric initially suggested doing this in the comments to issue 13538.

Such a glossary entry would be useful because the buffer protocol (or buffer 
object) should likely be cited, for example, wherever a function accepts a 
bytes object, bytearray object, or any object that supports the buffer 
protocol.  The str() constructor is one example where this is done:

"Buffer object" might be the more useful term to add to the glossary because it 
would help to have a briefer way of saying "any object that supports the buffer 
protocol."  (I'm assuming this is what "buffer object" actually means.)

The patch for this issue should also do a comprehensive review of occurrences 
of buffer object/protocol throughout the docs and add or update links and index 
entries where appropriate.

assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 176042
nosy: chris.jerdonek, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, pitrou
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: add "buffer protocol" to glossary
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4

Python tracker <>
Python-bugs-list mailing list

Reply via email to