Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > > I wouldn't use "bytes-like object". > > What about "buffer-like object"?
"buffer-like" means "like a buffer" which is wrong on two points: - "buffer" is not defined at this point, so the user doesn't understand what it means - we are not talking about an object which is "like a buffer", but which "provides a buffer" ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16518> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
