C19 added the comment: # TODO(jhylton): Should this be redesigned to handle # persistent connections?
# We want to make an HTTP/1.1 request, but the addinfourl # class isn't prepared to deal with a persistent connection. # It will try to read all remaining data from the socket, # which will block while the server waits for the next request. # So make sure the connection gets closed after the (only) # request. headers["Connection"] = "close" http://bugs.python.org/issue9740 this has been a long time..how many is annoyed by this..Count me in.. persistent connections may not be easy on various OS and act the same. I'm just satisfied if it works on linux. ---------- title: seriously? http.cookiejar.FileCookieJar().save method NOTImplemented? -> seriously? urllib still doesn't support persistent connections? versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16942> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com