Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > If the API is more like self.assert*()'s "msg" parameter which appends > data to the usual exception, then it will be the same as what people > are already used to.
It might be a good idea to allow both this and the arbitrary parameter kwargs, then. > I'm not advocating independent addressability/runnability of subtests > or the following approach, but a naive way to do this would be to run > the TestCase as usual, but skip over any subTest blocks if the > parameter data isn't an exact match. Well, I still don't know how to skip a `with` block (short of raising an exception that will terminate the entire test). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16997> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
