Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I don't really think they deserve documenting.
pystones can arguably be a cheap and easy way of comparing performance of different systems *using the exact same Python interpreter*. It's the only point of running pystones. As for pybench, it probably had a point when there wasn't anything better, but I don't think it has anymore. We have a much better benchmarks suite right now, and we also have a couple specialized benchmarks in the tools directory. ---------- nosy: +pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15369> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
