Eric Snow added the comment: Any objections to what Brett proposed? Any preferences on a name? How about DualImplementationTests? Here's a patch with tests.
I added a pure_python_only() decorator in addition to accelerated_only(). I also made both work as decorators for classes and methods (just like unittest.skip()). Finally, I added on a with_module_exported() decorator to help with the scenario from issue #16817. Eli, I know it doesn't quite fill the gap you described in msg180669, but hopefully it's an improvement. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28973/dual-impl-tests.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17037> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
