New submission from Giampaolo Rodola': profile and cProfile modules define the same utility functions (run() and runctx()) which use the same code except the profiler class. Considering that we're going to add 2 new utility functions (runcall() and runblock(), see issue9285 and issue17130) I think we should refactor the code in order to avoid this code duplication. Patch in attachment does that. The approach I came up with looks a bit hackish though so I'd like to get some feedback. Is it acceptable?
---------- files: profile-refactoring.diff keywords: patch messages: 181980 nosy: georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: c/profile refactoring Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29053/profile-refactoring.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17197> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
