Albert Zeyer added the comment: > Wouldn't it be better to expose and re-use the HEAD_LOCK and HEAD_UNLOCK > macros from pystate.c?
The macro-names HEAD_LOCK/HEAD_UNLOCK irritates me a bit. Protecting only the head would not be enough. Any tstate object could be invalidated. But actually, it protects any modification on the list (both in tstate_delete_common and in new_threadstate), as far as I see it. But yes, it would be a good thing to export this locking functionality so other code can use it. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17263> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
