Lei Miao added the comment: is_private should return true for all prefixes that are intended for *private* use, hence it should include rfc1918 and rfc6598. rfc6598 stipulates 100.64.0.0/10
On 16 March 2013 06:34, pmoody <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > pmoody added the comment: > > Is the request that is_private should return true for all > reserved/non-routable addresses? The docstrings refer to specific rfcs > which don't cover most of the addresses listed in the wikipedia page. I > haven't done a lot of network programming in the last couple of years, so > what do folks think the least surprising result here would be? > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue17400> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17400> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
