mrjbq7 added the comment: > Richard was saying that you shouldn't serialize such a large array, > that's just a huge performance bottleneck. The right way would be > to use a shared memory.
Gotcha, for clarification, my original use case was to *create* them in the other process (something which took some time since they were calculated and not just random as in the example) and returned to the original process for further computation... ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17560> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
