Charles-François Natali added the comment: > i don't think that's it, look at the result output in comment #183756: the > list of fds is correct, except that they aren't closed as they should be.
Of course the list is correct: the message is printed by the parent process, which opened the FDs ;-) > i can't reproduce the result when running code by hand, so it's either a race > or an issue with test setup. If it's random, yes. One way to debug this would be to run the test with "strace -f". > so far i figured out that this goes away when patch from issue #16962 is > reverted Note that the patch doesn't retry getdents64() on EINTR, and retries close() on EINTR while it's not advised, see this post by Linus: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/330619 ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12466> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
