Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: On Mar 30, 2013, at 12:29 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
>Would it be okay to do a check on __index__ after the PyLong_Check() >succeeds? Something like this: > > if (PyLong_Check(item) && > item->ob_type->tp_as_number->nb_index == > PyLong_Type.tp_as_number->nb_index) { > Py_INCREF(item); > return item; > } > >This is something Nick and I were talking about at the sprints regarding fast >paths in the abstract API (for mappings and sequences in our case). I think that would work, yes. With this extra check, overriding __index__() in the subclass should fail this condition and fall back to the PyIndex_Check() clause. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17576> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com