paul j3 added the comment:
Yes, http://bugs.python.org/msg166175 does use 'parse_args' in the second call.
But I think things would be more flexible if we had a second function:
def parse_???(self, args=None, namespace=None):
args, argv = self.parse_intermixed_args(args, namespace)
if argv:
msg = _('unrecognized arguments: %s')
self.error(msg % ' '.join(argv))
return args
But then what would a be a good pair of names?
parse??? and parse_intermixed_args
versus
parse_intermixed_args and parse_known_intermixed_args
or
something else?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14191>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
