Ezio Melotti added the comment:
A couple of comments:
1) A separate function might be better. I think this kind of output would be
more useful while inspecting individual byte objects, rather than having it for
arbitrary byte objects (that might be inside other containers).
2) I don't know if the output of pprint is supposed to be eval()uable, but I
don't like too much the base64.b16decode(...).replace(' ', '') in the output
(especially if the byte objects are short). If a separate function is used as
suggested in 1) this won't be a problem. Using the hex_codec might be another
option.
----------
nosy: +ezio.melotti
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17868>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
