Charles-François Natali added the comment: > To be honest I can't find much to say about this proposal,
Hum, OK, I thought it would be a useful addition :-) > but I think it would be good if the time function were configurable (both for > test purposes, and to allow passing e.g. time.monotonic). I suppose this > could be an executor option. Note that the time function must be "real" time, since the sleep are based on condition.wait() (otherwise if you just call an arbitrary sleep() function you can't be woken up when a new task with an earlier deadline is submitted). So it's different from the sched module, we can't really support arbitrary time functions. Note that I do think it would be a good idea to use time.monotonic() when available (almost all modules have been updated, except the future one). That's probably another issue, though. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17956> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
