Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: On Jun 19, 2013, at 06:45 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>To sum up: the name is already available in the name, no need to have it be >the value as well. I am open to changing the start value to zero instead of >one (which is what I do in my customization of Enum in my personal modules ;) I'm sure it's obvious that I prefer start-from-one, and aside from the truthiness question, it would maximize compatibility with flufl.enum. Besides, the functional API accepts a sequence so if you *really* wanted start-from-zero, then you can do it easily. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17961> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
