David Wolever added the comment:
Here's the relevant diff. Will commit on a +1.
diff --git a/Doc/library/datetime.rst b/Doc/library/datetime.rst
--- a/Doc/library/datetime.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/datetime.rst
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@
| ``%M`` | Minute as a zero-padded | 00, 01, ..., 59 | |
| | decimal number. | | |
+-----------+--------------------------------+------------------------+-------+
-| ``%S`` | Second as a zero-padded | 00, 01, ..., 61 | \(3) |
+| ``%S`` | Second as a zero-padded | 00, 01, ..., 59 | \(3) |
| | decimal number. | | |
+-----------+--------------------------------+------------------------+-------+
| ``%f`` | Microsecond as a decimal | 000000, 000001, ..., | \(4) |
@@ -1728,12 +1728,8 @@
the output hour field if the ``%I`` directive is used to parse the hour.
(3)
- The range really is ``0`` to ``61``; according to the Posix standard this
- accounts for leap seconds and the (very rare) double leap seconds.
- The :mod:`time` module may produce and does accept leap seconds since
- it is based on the Posix standard, but the :mod:`datetime` module
- does not accept leap seconds in :meth:`strptime` input nor will it
- produce them in :func:`strftime` output.
+ Unlike the :mod:`time` module, the :mod:`datetime` module does not support
+ leap seconds.
(4)
``%f`` is an extension to the set of format characters in the C standard
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18718>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
