Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > In other words, we're paying a price for the dummy object being > printable as a string.
Which is pointless, I agree. > Antoine, thanks to the link to the python-dev discussion. I hope we > can come with a solution that doesn't involve going back to unicode > objects. Re-using PyDict's dummy object would be a solution, AFAICT? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18772> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
