Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Repaired version ---------------- $ py -m timeit -s 'from random import seed, randrange; seed(8675309); data=[randrange(1000) for i in range(100000)]; from collections import Counter' 'Counter(data)' 100 loops, best of 3: 14.3 msec per loop $ py -m timeit -s 'from random import seed, randrange; seed(8675309); data=[randrange(500000) for i in range(100000)]; from collections import Counter' 'Counter(data)' 10 loops, best of 3: 40.8 msec per loop
Current with accelerator ------------------------ $ py -m timeit -s 'from random import seed, randrange; seed(8675309); data=[randrange(1000) for i in range(100000)]; from collections import Counter' 'Counter(data)' 10 loops, best of 3: 61.7 msec per loop $ py -m timeit -s 'from random import seed, randrange; seed(8675309); data=[randrange(500000) for i in range(100000)]; from collections import Counter' 'Counter(data)' 10 loops, best of 3: 118 msec per loop Current without accelerator --------------------------- $ py -m timeit -s 'from random import seed, randrange; seed(8675309); data=[randrange(1000) for i in range(100000)]; from collections import Counter' 'Counter(data)' 10 loops, best of 3: 54.9 msec per loop $ py -m timeit -s 'from random import seed, randrange; seed(8675309); data=[randrange(500000) for i in range(100000)]; from collections import Counter' 'Counter(data)' 10 loops, best of 3: 80.8 msec per loop ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18594> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
