Martin v. Löwis added the comment:

Ok, this this remains a release blocker. I'm still +1 for removing it, and I'm 
-0 for removing it just before the release candidate. AFAICT, there is *zero* 
(.000000001) chance that it actually becomes a NIST standard before the Python 
release is made. According to the current timeline:

 http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/sha-3/timeline_fips.html

the *submission to the secretary* (of commerce) was scheduled for Q2. With the 
current delay, this must become Q3, so the publication as a standard might 
happen in Q4 (not sure how long the Secretary of Commerce needs to study the 
specification of a hash algorithm).

What might happen is that a draft is published by the time the RC is made. I'd 
then still be -1 on including something in Python that only implements a draft 
standard. So we could just as well remove it right away.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16113>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to