Stefan Seefeld added the comment:
Mark,
thanks for the quick follow-up.
OK, i now understand the situation better. The documentation I had read
originally didn't talk about special-casing built-in objects. (And since
I want to extend a tuple, I do have to override __getslice__ since I
want to make sure the returned object still has the derived type.)
Yes, I believe this issue can be closed as invalid.
(Though I believe the docs could be a bit more clear about this.)
Thanks,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
__________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2041>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
