Jag Ginsberg added the comment: I appreciate your quick response, and I certainly hope you won't read this as me being anything but ignorant, but how can a property whose function definitions include "self" be "about" the class and not the instance?
I agree that Foo.__dict__ should include the <property object> reference, but if a property is supposed to be a function that behaves like an instance attribute (I say "instance" because of the presence of self in the arguments and not cls), wouldn't it make sense for its value to be included in foo_obj.__dict__ like every other attribute whose value is specific to the instance? I'm sure my misunderstanding is in the intended definitions of __dict__ and of property(). :-/ __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2040> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
