Guido van Rossum added the comment: Now looking. Note that a few parts of the patch no longer cleanly apply:
hg import --no-c http://bugs.python.org/review/download/issue20189_10572.diff applying http://bugs.python.org/review/download/issue20189_10572.diff patching file Modules/_cursesmodule.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 649 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Modules/_cursesmodule.c.rej patching file Modules/_dbmmodule.c Hunk #3 FAILED at 310 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Modules/_dbmmodule.c.rej patching file Modules/_opcode.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 63 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Modules/_opcode.c.rej patching file Modules/zlibmodule.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 226 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Modules/zlibmodule.c.rej patching file Tools/clinic/clinic.py Hunk #6 FAILED at 1482 Hunk #7 succeeded at 1502 with fuzz 2 (offset -14 lines). Hunk #12 FAILED at 2393 2 out of 22 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Tools/clinic/clinic.py.rej abort: patch failed to apply ---------- nosy: +gvanrossum _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20189> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
