Charles-François Natali added the comment: > I don't think so. Please read again the issue #20452, for example this message: > > http://bugs.python.org/issue20452#msg209772
""" Ok, it looks better: waiting 99.9 ms took 99.6 ms and 99.9 ms, and waiting 9.9 ms took 9.7 ms. So as I said, the granularity (of 1 ms) is still needed in asyncio (dt < timeout is sometimes False, but dt+granulary >= timeout is always True). """ Sorry, I still fail to see how waking up after 99.6ms instead of 99.9ms is an issue: I've asked you several times to provide an actual example of a problem, and you still haven't. Once again: a slight early wakeup isn't an issue, you'll just call epoll()/select() once again. All even loops work this way, and noone ever complained. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20311> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
