Pavel Kazakov added the comment: > (Alternatively, we could redefine squares in Python. All other languages > just have the regular squares; Python has a super *extra* square 2! That > clearly makes squares in Python *better* than squares in other languages...)
Heh. I initially wasn't sure if I was just missing a super fancy feauture of Python, but I eventually concluded the 2 probably wasn't supposed to be there. In the name of making Python better, since π and -1 have already been proposed as additional squares, I vote for including the constant e as well. > Fixed, thanks for the report and the patch! Great! Thanks. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20740> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
